Skip to main content
Integrations should reason about engagements in the state vocabulary below. The names are stable enough to map partner-side status onto, and no name encodes internal criteria. Where a state represents internal review, it is deliberately opaque: the state shows that an engagement is in review, not why.

The vocabulary

cpa_gate and soteris_review signal that an engagement is under review authority and that no released outcome exists yet. Neither state discloses what is being evaluated or against what bar. Treat both as wait signals, not as inputs to partner-side logic. Who is allowed to act in each state is defined in Actor boundaries.